A USDC-funded Visa with 0% FX and 49 eligible countries, wrapped in a company that publishes almost nothing about its licence

Updated October 2026

Licensed

Available in US

Fast payouts

18+ Only

If you are reading this, you have probably already hit a wall with an ordinary bank account: a declined application, a country the bank will not touch, an address that does not fit the form, or a job that makes the paperwork uncomfortable. The Avici card is one of the crypto cards that exist for exactly that situation, and on paper it looks unusually well made. Zero percent forex markup. Zero transaction fee. Cash out at an ATM on the cheaper tier for nothing. A card you load yourself, held in your own wallet. Those are not marketing phrases; the card’s own published fee list says so.

And yet my overall mark for it is 6.1 out of 10, which tells you most of the story. The card mechanics score well. The company behind it does not, because the public pages simply do not say who licenses the card, and the sample of user complaints I could find is small but ugly: a business user reporting a 20,000 EUR payment credited and then blocked, with support going quiet.

Conditions and figures below are current as of October 28, 2026.

Verdict: 6.1 / 10, and the gap is entirely about trust

Here is my score card, criterion by criterion, with the reasoning behind each number.

Total: 6.1 / 10.

The shape of that table is the whole verdict. Nine out of ten for everyday use is rare, and I want to be honest about why: as a card, this is well specified. It is a Visa. It works in Apple Pay and Google Pay. It costs nothing to spend. The ATM fee on the Signature tier is genuinely zero, which most competitors cannot say.

But the middle column is where your money actually sits, and three of those fives are fives for thin reasons rather than bad reasons. Cost is a 5 because the fee list is unusually good and the pricing ladder is unusually steep: you can pay $50 for a physical Platinum and still be on the tier with a $1 plus 0.65% ATM fee and a 0.4–1% Visa cross-border charge waiting on non-USD purchases. Top-up is a 5 because officially you fund it with one coin, USDC, on one route, and anything else is an unofficial claim from a third-party site. And reliability is a 5 because the thing I could not verify is the thing that matters most: the licence.

So who is this for? In my reading, residents of Latin America and the UAE who already hold USDC and would otherwise be stuck without a card — that is the person the card is built for, and the reasoning follows the funding design directly. USDC is the fuel; if you already hold it, this is close to free to spend. If you are trying to buy USDC with the card, you have misunderstood the product.

And who it does not suit: anyone who needs a card in the European Economic Area, Georgia, Serbia, Armenia or Kazakhstan, since none of those appear on the list. Anyone who needs multi-currency balances. Anyone who wants to know, in writing, which institution stands behind the card. Anyone whose spending depends on gambling or on paying financial institutions directly. And anyone for whom an unexplained frozen account would be worse than no card at all, because that is exactly the complaint that is sitting in the public record.

Will they give you the card?

The single fact that decides most applications is geography, and it splits three ways.

There is a residency whitelist of 49 entries. Among the named ones: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Colombia, Hong Kong, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Singapore, Thailand, the United Arab Emirates, South Africa and the USA, where it is subject to the supported states list. No EU country is on it. Nor are Georgia, Serbia, Armenia or Kazakhstan.

Then there is a prohibition list of 17 countries where residence is not allowed at all: Belarus, China (Mainland), Cuba, India, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Myanmar, Nepal, Nicaragua, North Korea, Russia, Syria, Turkey, Ukraine, Venezuela, Vietnam.

And a third, shorter list of places where spending is prohibited even if you hold the card: Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia, Syria, Ukraine, Venezuela. Note that six of those seven overlap with the residence bans, so the spending ban is mostly a restatement — the one addition is Israel, which is not on the residence ban list but is on the spending ban list. If you are an Israeli resident holding an eligible residence elsewhere, that is the detail to read twice.

Two further things the card’s public pages do not state, and I will say so once here rather than hedging repeatedly below: proof of address is never mentioned in the verification description, and the citizenship rule is not stated. Residence is what the published lists cover. If your citizenship differs from your residence, you are in territory the documentation does not reach, and that is worth raising with support before you invest time in an application.

One structural note that helps explain the two different lists: a card number begins with a six- or eight-digit issuer identification number, and merchants can look that number up to see which institution and country issued it. A card issued in one country can therefore look foreign to a shop in another. Issuers in restricted jurisdictions generally cannot be listed at all, which is why the residence and spending bans exist as separate lists rather than one.

How to get it

The route is short, and the card markets that it is short: “card ready in 2 minutes via app.” That claim is about the virtual card, not the plastic.

Verification is single-stage and handled by Sumsub after you sign up with an email address. It covers your personal details, ID documents and a liveness check. The stated duration is “about 2 minutes” or “no more than a few minutes.” Document types and rejection reasons are not listed on the pages, so you are signing up without knowing in advance what will be accepted. Business accounts go through separate verification.

Your KYC data is shared with the card’s partners, and Sumsub performs AML monitoring of users and of on-chain funds — which is normal and not itself a warning sign. What the documentation does not describe is the escalation path: what happens if a payment is held, who decides, and how long it takes.

Once approved, you choose between tiers and between virtual and physical. Platinum and Signature each exist in both forms. Virtual cards are issued per category — subscriptions, groceries, travel — so you can freeze a streaming card without touching your food budget. A physical card is delivered as well.

On delivery: standard shipping is free and untracked, 3–4 weeks. Priority tracked is $50 internationally, 1–2 weeks, or $15 in the US, where the timing is not stated. Which countries receive physical cards, and what a replacement costs if it is lost, are both not stated. If speed matters, the untracked free route is a real constraint, and a stolen or lost card’s replacement cost is a number you do not currently know.

The application itself is not a problem. The question is entirely who is on the other side of it, and I take that up in the risks section.

Fees: what it really costs you in a month

The card advertises “No Hidden Fee” and “No Gas Fee, No Interchange Fee” without attaching amounts, which is marketing rather than information. The numbers below come from the actual fee and tier tables.

Two things to read carefully in that table. First, the 0% forex markup is not the whole cost of spending abroad: Visa may add 0.4–1% on top for cross-border transactions, and that charge is Visa’s, not Avici’s, so no amount you negotiate with the card will remove it. Second, the Signature tier is the one with the $0 ATM fee and the $0 declined-transaction fee, and it costs more — $30 rather than $15 for a virtual card in year one. Which tier is cheaper depends entirely on how often you take cash out.

The limits are tight in a way that deserves emphasis: $1,000 per transaction, $3,000 a day, three transactions a day. That is fine for groceries and travel bookings, and it will not cover a large purchase. The card’s own framing is “no transaction limits by default” with per-card limits adjustable in settings, which I read as: the ceiling exists, and you may be able to lower it.

Now three everyday payments, so this stops being abstract.

Coffee abroad. You tap a card in a Lisbon café. Transaction fee $0, forex markup 0%, plus Visa’s cross-border 0.4–1% if the merchant settles in euros. On a small purchase, the cost is negligible. The limits are irrelevant. This is the case the card is built for.

A monthly subscription in dollars. $12.99, USD to USD, no cross-border element at all. $0 fee, $0 markup. If you use the category cards, one subscription can be frozen without affecting the others. Also close to free — and this is where virtual cards per category earn their keep.

Cash at an airport ATM in a country you are merely transiting. Here the tiers diverge sharply. On Signature, $0. On Platinum, $1 plus 0.65% — so a $200 withdrawal costs $2.30. The counter-argument is that ATMs use the card’s ordinary limits, so a $500 withdrawal exceeds the $1,000 per-transaction or $3,000 daily ceiling, and three withdrawals a day is the hard cap. One unofficial source, kkinvesting.io on 20 Oct 2026, gives a separate figure of a $250 daily ATM limit with a maximum of 3 transactions, which contradicts the card’s own numbers. I could not confirm that, so treat the official limits as the ones to plan around.

On-chain network fees are a separate matter entirely: the gas or bandwidth cost of your deposit is charged by the blockchain, not by the card, which is why the card can honestly say “no gas fee” about its own side of the transaction.

Top up: the USDC escrow route, and the chain rule you must respect

Funding works like this: you deposit crypto to Avici and the card is topped up from your balance, with “withdraw funds anytime” on offer. The coins and networks are not listed on the general pages, and the route is described elsewhere as the specific one below. Fiat top-up options are not stated at all.

The mechanism is more interesting than a typical card. You fund it by depositing USDC into a Loan Escrow smart contract, which is what creates your USD credit balance. Spent USDC is liquidated from that contract every one to two days, sometimes weekly — so the on-chain footprint of your spending is not immediate, which is worth knowing if you care about the timing.

No top-up fee, no fee for withdrawing to your wallet, no minimum top-up stated. An unofficial source, kkinvesting.io on 20 Oct 2026, puts the minimum at $1 with arrival in 2–7 minutes, and describes top-ups in USDC or any token through a Relay auto-swap on EVM L2 or Solana. That wider token support is not in the official material, so I would not plan around it.

The custody story is the strongest part of the design. The escrow is self-custodial: your own wallet owns the contract, and you can withdraw what remains after spend charges are deducted. The provider can only withdraw funds tied to those charges. The documentation states plainly that neither Third National, nor Avici, nor Visa controls the loan contract. If you have used a custodial card before, that sentence is the reason to keep reading.

The one hard rule that catches people: the chain has to be right. Blockchain transfers are irreversible. A deposit sent on a network the provider does not support, or to an address belonging to a different network, can simply be lost, or need manual recovery with no guarantee. And a wallet holding a token but no gas token cannot send it — on Ethereum networks fees are paid in ETH, and on Tron they are paid through bandwidth and energy. Check the network before you press send, not after.

Paying with it every day

This is where the card earns its 9. Apple Pay and Google Pay tap-to-pay are supported, on a self-custody base with passkeys and account abstraction. The blocked merchant categories are not stated officially; kkinvesting.io on 20 Oct 2026 lists gambling, illegal drugs and financial institutions as restricted, with the last needing additional approval.

If that unofficial list is accurate, it is more restrictive than many competitors and you should test it before relying on it. The mechanism behind it is ordinary enough: a merchant category code is a four-digit number classifying a business, assigned under ISO 18245 when a business starts accepting cards. MCC 7995 covers gambling — casinos, betting, lotteries — and issuers block it by policy, not by law, with the list differing by issuer. Payment to financial institutions is often gated the same way, since sending money to another institution is exactly what anti-money-laundering controls are designed to watch.

Perks are listed: airline miles, rental car insurance, travel and restaurant perks, trip protection, and a reference to “Avenue to TradeFI rewards.” No cashback rate is stated. Treat the perks as unquantified marketing until you see a number.

The app is reachable from the homepage via a “Download App” shortlink, but which platforms it runs on and its App Store or Google Play ratings are not stated. That is a small thing and an annoying one — app reviews are usually the fastest honest signal available, and here the door is closed.

And one practical gap that most people only discover too late: the chargeback and disputed-payment process is not stated. The security page does not cover it. The only dispute-related statement the documentation makes is that if you pay for a card but do not complete or pass verification, in-app support is the route to a refund. What happens when a shop takes your money and does not deliver, or when a payment is charged back at you? You will be reading the card network’s rules, not Avici’s. As general background, chargebacks are refunds ordered by the issuer under reason codes such as fraud, duplicate billing or goods not received, and consumer reversal rights differ sharply between jurisdictions: in the US, Regulation E covers debit cards and Regulation Z covers credit cards, while prepaid-card coverage varies and should not be assumed to apply.

What can go wrong

The licence gap. This is the finding I would not paper over. Avici Inc. is at 300 4th St, San Francisco, CA 94107. The documentation names “Third National” as a party to the loan contract structure, without detailing its role, and the issuer and BIN sponsor are not stated. Full issuer and licence details are not stated. An unofficial source names Rain as the issuing partner with KYC data shared with it. In EU terms, an electronic money institution can issue e-money, payment cards and e-wallets but cannot lend, and under MiCA an e-money token may be issued only by a credit institution or an electronic money institution. A card that provides credit-like balances touches more than one regime, and a crypto card often depends on two licences. I could not verify from the card’s own pages which one applies here.

The complaint. A 31 Mar 2026 review describes a business-account user whose incoming payment of EUR 20,000 was credited and then blocked, whose account was restricted, whose support went silent and who received no refund. A Jan 2026 review describes repeated login errors at email and authenticator verification. Both are unverified user reports and the sample is tiny — I want to be honest that two anecdotes are not a pattern. But the first one is the exact failure mode you care about: money arrives, then it does not move, and nobody explains. Trustpilot shows 3.5 out of 5 across 5 reviews, which is too small a base to mean much in either direction.

Dates that are older than they look. The Prohibitions page was last updated 19 Aug 2025, the Terms of Service for the Avici Card on 23 Jun 2025, the Business Program Terms on 16 Oct 2025. The docs index also lists Business Cards, Credit Line, Markets and Grow products, so the product line is broader than the card. Whether the rules in front of you match the rules in front of a support agent in 2026 is not something I can check for you.

What support is. Not stated. The documentation names no support channel except in-app support for verification refunds. Languages and hours are not stated. If you do not read English fluently and there is no other language documented, weigh that seriously before you depend on this card for payroll or remittances.

What the security page covers. Solid where it counts: a self-custodial escrow contract, freeze (temporary stop of spending), permanent cancel, per-card spending limits, PIN, show and hide card details. Two-factor authentication, passkeys and insurance are not stated on the security page, though the homepage mentions passkeys. So the controls I would actually rely on are the ones inside the app: freeze, limits, PIN.

Category history is not a comfort. Card programmes do close. Visa terminated its global agreements with FTX on 13 November 2022 and the FTX US debit card was wound down by its issuer. WaveCrest, a Visa issuer that supplied crypto card brands, was suspended by Visa in Europe in 2018, closing all its Visa programmes. The pattern in a closure is a notice period, then spending and loading stop, then you are asked to withdraw remaining balances. That is why “withdraw funds anytime” and self-custodial escrow are worth more than they look.

Taxes. The IRS treats digital assets as property, so exchanging them for goods or services generally produces a taxable gain or loss, measured in local fiat currency at fair market value on the date of the transaction — which can make each card payment a separate disposal event. I am not giving tax advice here; I am flagging that the ledger question exists and is yours or your accountant’s to resolve.

What to take instead

I have read the comparison set, and it is not a clean win either way. Here is the honest comparison across the four cards.

The two cards that score close to Avici pull in opposite directions. TokenPocket is the weakest of the four: virtual only, no physical card mentioned, balances in EUR24 and USD24, running on Arbitrum, with a 1% fee on crypto deposits that the page says is refunded later through rewards or reduced transaction fees — a refund in reward points is not the same as a refunded fee. Its Americas availability is described as planned for Q2 2025, and the US and UK sign-ups are temporarily closed on MetaMask’s side too. If you are in Latin America or the UAE, TokenPocket is not the answer.

MetaMask scores highest at 7.1, and the reason is transparency rather than generosity. It opens in 45 listed countries and territories with proof of residency required; ineligible regions limit sign-ups, not spending. It names its issuer, Monovate, and its card provider, Crypto Life. One virtual card per user, a free virtual card, $199/year for metal. Rewards are stated precisely: 1% cashback in mUSD on Virtual; on Metal the headline is 3% but the footnote limits it to 3% on the first $10,000 spent and 1% after that — which is the kind of detail that tells you someone read the terms. It also lists the networks it supports, Linea, Base, Monad and Solana, and names the tokens, including mUSD, wETH, EURe, GBPe, USDC and USDT. The catch is availability: US and UK sign-ups are temporarily closed.

KAST matches Avici’s 6.1 and is the most interesting alternative if you are eligible. It offers up to 10 cards per user across Visa Platinum, Visa Infinite metal and Visa Infinite gold, with a USD balance from stablecoins converted 1:1 at a 0% spread. Fees are explicit: stablecoin top-up 0%, card spend 0%, transaction 0%, Apple and Google Pay 0%, non-USD FX 0.5–1.75% depending on your country, 0.10 USD on non-USD transactions under 25 USD, and 0.50 USD for a declined transaction on insufficient balance. Cashback is the strongest in the set: 1.5% on the first 2,000 USD a month, 2% on the first 10,000, 3% on the first 40,000. What stops it being the obvious pick is entry: Standard is free, but Premium is 1,000 USD a year and Private 10,000 USD a year, billed annually upfront with no monthly option, plus 1 USD a month inactivity fee after 12 months. And its eligibility rules are stricter than Avici’s in a way that bites: living in a supported country while holding an ID from a restricted region may still make you ineligible, only your own ID is accepted, and a VPN does not bypass this. There is also an internal conflict in its own terms, where acceptable tokens are stated as USDT and USDC while the app also lists PYUSD and RLUSD.

My actual recommendation: if you hold USDC and are in Latin America or the UAE, Avici is a reasonable choice on the card itself — the fee structure is the best of the four for someone spending USD. If what you want is a card you can read the fine print on and trust the issuer behind, MetaMask is the one with names in the documents, subject to where you live. If you spend heavily and want cashback, look at KAST’s free Standard tier before paying Avici’s $50 for a physical Platinum.

Who I would recommend it to

I would recommend this card, with eyes open, to one specific person: someone living in an eligible Latin American or UAE jurisdiction who already holds USDC, does not qualify for a conventional bank card or has had one refused, and treats the card balance as working capital rather than savings.

For that person the fit is unusually good. Zero percent forex markup means spending a stablecoin-held dollar abroad does not quietly shave a percentage off every purchase. The $0 ATM fee on Signature means cash is not the expensive fallback it is on most crypto cards. Category cards mean one frozen subscription does not freeze everything. And the self-custodial escrow means the balance sits in a contract your own wallet owns, with the documentation stating that neither Third National, nor Avici, nor Visa controls it — a stronger position than most cards in this category offer, and the single best thing about Avici.

I would not recommend it to four kinds of person. If you need a card in the EEA or in Georgia, Serbia, Armenia or Kazakhstan, it is not available to you and no workaround changes that. If you need to hold several currencies at once, multi-currency balances are not stated, so it does not do that job. If your plan involves gambling or paying financial institutions, that is the area the unofficial blocked-category list flags. And if you cannot absorb a frozen balance with no published support channel and no published chargeback process, the unresolved 20,000 EUR complaint is a reason to look elsewhere.

Two questions worth asking support before you load money: what happens if a credit is reversed or held, and which institution actually issues the card. The first one because the dispute process is not documented. The second because everything in this review about your money’s legal protection depends on the answer.

Frequently asked questions

What is the Avici card?

The Avici card is a Visa payment card funded by crypto rather than by a bank account. You deposit USDC into a Loan Escrow smart contract, that deposit creates a USD credit balance, and the card spends from it. Both virtual and physical forms exist in Platinum and Signature tiers, with virtual cards issued per category — subscriptions, groceries, travel — so you can freeze one without touching the rest. The balance sits in a self-custodial contract your own wallet owns.

How does the Avici card work day to day?

You spend the loaded balance as you would from any Visa, in a shop, online or via Apple Pay and Google Pay. The card charges $0 per transaction and applies a 0% forex markup, though Visa may add 0.4–1% on cross-border purchases. Spent USDC is liquidated from the escrow contract every one to two days, sometimes weekly, and limits apply: $1,000 per transaction, $3,000 a day, three transactions a day. You can freeze the card, cancel it permanently, or set per-card spending limits in the app.

Is Avici a bank?

No. Avici Inc. is a company at 300 4th St, San Francisco, CA 94107, and the card’s documentation names Third National as a party to the loan contract structure without detailing its role. Neither the issuer, nor the BIN sponsor, nor the licences are stated on the card’s public pages. An unofficial source names Rain as the issuing partner. Ask support directly which institution issues the card before you rely on it — the legal answer shapes your protection.

Who can get the Avici card?

Residents of 49 listed regions, including Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Colombia, Hong Kong, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Singapore, Thailand, the UAE, South Africa and the USA (subject to a supported states list). No EU country, Georgia, Serbia, Armenia or Kazakhstan appears. Residence is prohibited in Belarus, China (Mainland), Cuba, India, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Myanmar, Nepal, Nicaragua, North Korea, Russia, Syria, Turkey, Ukraine, Venezuela and Vietnam. Citizenship rules are not stated.

Does the Avici card require KYC?

Yes. Verification is single-stage through Sumsub after email sign-up: personal details, ID documents and a liveness check, described as taking about 2 minutes. Your KYC data is shared with the card’s partners, and Sumsub monitors users and on-chain funds for anti-money-laundering purposes. Document types and rejection reasons are not listed, and proof of address is not mentioned. Business accounts have separate verification. The two-minute claim covers verification and a virtual card, not the physical one.

Is the Avici card free?

Not quite. A virtual Platinum card is $15 for the first one and $10 for each later card; a physical Platinum is $50 one-time. The Signature tier costs $30 in the first year and $20 a year after for virtual, or $75 plus $20 a year for physical. Spending is free: $0 transaction fee, 0% forex markup, no top-up fee, and $0 to withdraw back to your wallet. The Signature tier is the one with the $0 ATM fee.

What are the Avici card’s limits?

Per transaction $1,000, per day $3,000, and three transactions a day, with ATM withdrawals drawing on the same limits. The card describes this as “no transaction limits by default” with per-card limits adjustable in settings. One unofficial source, kkinvesting.io on 20 Oct 2026, gives a separate $250 daily ATM cap that contradicts the card’s own figures — plan around the official numbers. Note that a $1,000 ceiling rules out most large purchases outright.

How do I top up the Avici card?

You deposit USDC into the Loan Escrow smart contract, which creates your USD credit balance. There is no top-up fee and no minimum is stated; an unofficial source puts the minimum at $1 with arrival in 2–7 minutes. Fiat top-up options are not stated. Check the network before sending — transfers are irreversible, and a deposit on an unsupported network or to the wrong address can be lost or need manual recovery with no guarantee.

Is the Avici card safe to use?

The structure is stronger than most: the escrow is self-custodial, your wallet owns the contract, withdrawal to wallet is $0, and the documentation says neither Third National, nor Avici, nor Visa controls it. In-app controls include freeze, permanent cancel, per-card limits, PIN and card detail hiding. But licences are not disclosed, the chargeback process is not stated, no support channel beyond in-app support for verification refunds is documented, and one unverified March 2026 review describes a business user’s 20,000 EUR payment blocked with no refund.

Can I use the Avici card in my country?

Check the 49-region residency list first — if you are not resident in one of them, you cannot hold the card. Then check the spending ban list: Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia, Syria, Ukraine and Venezuela are prohibited for spending even if you somehow hold the card. Merchants may also decline the card at their own discretion, since they can look up the issuer country from the card number, and a foreign-issued card can attract extra scrutiny or fail address verification.

Content created by the «cryptocardfacts» team